Die Effekte, die Nokia damit erzielt sind durchaus vielschichtig. Die NYT dazu:

Redeye analyst Greger Johansson in Stockholm, Sweden, said Nokia’s move will make Symbian a tougher competitor to the other operating systems, considering that Symbian already has 60 percent of the smart-phone market. Symbian software has yet to be popular in the U.S., where the smart-phone market has been dominated by Research in Motion Ltd., Palm Inc. and manufacturers using Windows Mobile. Apple Inc., with its iPhone, is an up-and-comer.

Kevin Burden, director of mobile devices at U.S.-based ABI Research, said the move also should produce substantial savings for Nokia, which has been paying Symbian more than $250 million a year in licensing fees.

Engadget Mobile:

Other Symbian Foundation members include Texas Instruments, Vodafone, Samsung, LG, and AT&T (yep, the same AT&T that currently sells precisely one Symbian-based phone), so things could get interesting. The move clearly seems to be a preemptive strike against Google’s Open Handset Alliance, LiMo, and other collaborative efforts forming around the globe with the goal of standardizing smartphone operating systems; the writing was on the wall, and Symbian didn’t want to miss the train. Total cash outlay for the move will run Nokia roughly €264 million — about $410 million in yankee currency.

…und nun planen sie, ihr recht träges und aufgeblasenes Symbian von einer Community weiterentwickeln zu lassen, die sich dann zwischen Android, Symbian und Linux-Derivaten entscheiden muß.

Zudem ist eine Foundation IMO nicht der beste Weg, ein OS weiterzuentwickeln, siehe LiMo. Da geht gar nix voran. Schaut mir unterm Strich eher nach Panikkauf aus.

Und noch eine Quelle, die man bei diesem Thema nicht verpassen sollte:
Rafe Blandford bei all abaout symbian.